A History of the University of Oxford by the Hon. G. C. Brodrick, D.C.L.

A History of the University of Oxford offers a magisterial and concise chronicle of one of Europe’s oldest institutions, spanning from its uncertain medieval origins through the pivotal reforms of the nineteenth century (up to 1886). Authored by George C. Brodrick, the Warden of Merton College, this book moves beyond fanciful antiquity to present a coherent narrative of Oxford’s development. It meticulously tracks the University’s transformation from a loose collection of schools to an organized system of colleges, detailing its internal intellectual currents, relentless conflicts with the City, and defining engagements with national Church and State politics, especially during the Reformation, the Civil Wars, and the tumultuous Neo-Catholic Revival.

---

Key Sections Before Summary

Who May Benefit from the Book

• Historians studying medieval and modern European institutions.
• Researchers interested in Church-State relations and academic autonomy.
• Scholars tracking the origins of the English collegiate system (Merton model).
• Readers specializing in the Renaissance, Reformation, and 19th-century religious movements.
• Students of institutional governance and educational reform.

Top 3 Key Insights

1. Oxford’s origins are obscure, but its growth was solidified by external forces, notably Parisian academic influence and early recognition/protection from the Papacy.
2. The collegiate system, pioneered by Merton, secularized and disciplined the chaotic early student life, ensuring long-term institutional stability and intellectual rigor.
3. The University consistently served as a battleground for theological and political power, fiercely aligning with the monarchy and the High Church party, particularly under Laud and during the Civil Wars.

4 More Lessons and Takeaways

1. Early student life was deeply tumultuous, plagued by chronic factional feuds (“Nations”) and the criminal disorders caused by “chamber-dekyns”.
2. Key moments of academic independence included severing Papal confirmation for the Chancellor (1368) and the successful resistance to James II during the Magdalen crisis.
3. The University endured significant periods of intellectual decay, especially in the 15th and 18th centuries, due to war, pestilence, and sinecurism.
4. Modernization, driven by the 1800 Examination Statute and the 1854 Act, ended clerical monopolies and opened the curriculum beyond just Classics and Mathematics.

The Book in 1 Sentence

This history tracks Oxford’s evolution from amorphous medieval schools to a disciplined, influential national intellectual powerhouse by 1886.

The Book Summary in 1 Minute

A History of the University of Oxford provides a succinct view of the ancient institution’s development. Beginning without a verifiable founding myth, Oxford emerged from local schools, influenced by Paris and early Papal recognition. The rise of colleges, especially Merton, brought vital discipline and structure, crucial for intellectual growth. The University navigated intense theological battles, political strife, and periods of decline, yet remained influential. The book highlights Oxford’s role in the Civil Wars, the ascendency of Laud, and finally, the major 19th-century reforms that modernized its government, curriculum, and religious tests, ensuring its lasting national character.

The 1 Completely Unique Aspect

The profound and unsettling statutory focus on suppressing the “chamber-dekyns”—unattached students defined as lurkers in taverns and brothels who were responsible for frequent murders, thefts, and general disturbances in the medieval city.

---

Chapter-wise Book Summary

CHAPTER I. THE RISE OF THE UNIVERSITY.

“The University of Oxford has long ceased to claim the fabulous antiquity for which its mediæval champions had contended, as for an article of faith…”.

The history opens by dismantling the cherished but unfounded myth that Alfred the Great founded the University. Oxford’s origins are truly unknown, likely stemming from local claustral schools (attached to monasteries) and secular teaching houses before the Norman Conquest. The first ascertained event is the arrival of Vacarius (from Bologna) around 1149 to lecture on civil law, indicating the schools already held European repute. Oxford borrowed heavily from the structure and prestige of the University of Paris. Crucially, the academic community secured its political footing after the murderous 1209 riot, leading to a decree in 1214 by the Papal Legate which recognized the scholars and imposed binding financial and ceremonial penalties on the burgesses. By the mid-13th century, the office of Chancellor was fully constituted, elected by the academic body, although initially subject to confirmation by the Bishop of Lincoln.

• Key Points:
  • Origin uncertain; Alfred myth refuted.
  • First historical evidence: Vacarius teaching civil law (c. 1149).
  • Papal recognition followed the 1209 town-and-gown riot.

CHAPTER II. THE EARLY COLLEGES.

“In the meantime Merton College had been founded on a far larger scale, and had received statutes which, viewed across the interval of six centuries, astonish us by their comprehensive wisdom and foresight.”.

The foundation of the early colleges marked a revolutionary structural shift. University College (1249) and Balliol (1263-1268) began as exhibition funds administered by the University or the founder’s wife, Dervorguilla. However, it was Merton College (1274), established by Walter de Merton, that provided the template for the entire English collegiate system. Merton’s statutes emphasized a secular community dedicated to study—not monastic life—prioritizing liberal arts before theology, thereby creating a seminary for men destined for service in Church and State. This new system brought much-needed order to the turbulent academic environment. Colleges offered superior discipline compared to the informal halls and provided refuge from the notorious ‘chamber-dekyns’—unattached students known for violence, theft, and lurid conduct—whose behavior the University sought aggressively to curb.

• Key Points:
  • Merton established the collegiate model (1274).
  • The collegiate structure instilled discipline lacking in public halls.
  • Early students were often poor; many resorted to mendicity.

CHAPTER III. PROGRESS OF THE UNIVERSITY IN THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY.

“Universities sprang up one after another—in France, in Spain, in Italy, in Poland, in Hungary, in Austria, and in Germany; nor is it unduly rash to surmise that, if the invention of printing could have been anticipated by a century, the Renaissance and the Reformation itself might have preceded the capture of Constantinople and the discovery of America.”.

The 14th century was eventful, characterized by intellectual fever despite social squalor, pestilence, and constant factional fighting, especially between the Northern and Southern ‘nations’. Collegiate expansion continued with the founding of Exeter (1314), Oriel (1324), Queen’s (1340), and the architecturally grand New College (1379). Oxford’s European status rose as the University of Paris declined and as Oxford schoolmen, like William of Occham, protested spiritual despotism. This era culminated in the academic revolution led by John Wyclif, a Realist and fierce critic of the mendicant orders and Papal abuses. Wyclif’s influence was so strong that when Pope Gregory XI issued a Bull against his doctrines, the University barely consented to receive it. The period also saw the growth of proctorial authority and, critically, the concession by Pope Urban in 1368 that the University could elect its Chancellor without diocesan confirmation, marking a major step toward academic independence.

• Key Points:
  • Intellectual rigor flourished despite internal strife (e.g., Northern/Southern feuds).
  • Wyclif launched a movement against Papal and monastic authority.
  • Academic independence secured via free Chancellor election (1368).

CHAPTER IV. CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE UNIVERSITY AND THE CITY.

“Contests about municipal franchises, prices of provisions, and rents of halls or inns, were eagerly fanned into a flame by the impetuous passions of youth, unrestrained by the kindlier sentiments of humanity and respect for others which temper party-spirit in this happier age.”.

The deep-seated feud between the University and the City frequently erupted into “sanguinary conflicts”. A grievous riot occurred in 1297, but the most notorious was the Great Riot of St. Scholastica’s Day, 1354. Triggered by a minor tavern brawl, the conflict raged for three days, culminating in townsmen pillaging halls and brutally killing scholars. The Church immediately took up the University’s cause, laying the city under an interdict. The subsequent penance forced the municipal authorities to make annual submission and pay a fine (formally abolished in 1825). Furthermore, the King granted the University a powerful new charter, giving the Chancellor sweeping authority over the city’s economy (assize of bread, wine, weights) and municipal matters, placing the City firmly subservient to the University.

• Key Points:
  • Chronic feuds focused on jurisdiction, rents, and provision prices.
  • 1354 St. Scholastica’s Day riot led to City’s formal submission.
  • The Chancellor gained extensive control over city governance.

CHAPTER V. THE MONKS AND FRIARS AT OXFORD.

“If the claustral schools of the Benedictines were the nursery of the University, a still more powerful impulse was imparted to it at a later period by the rise of the two great mendicant Orders…”.

The monastic settlements, including the Benedictines and Augustinians, were essential to the University’s early existence. The arrival of the Mendicant Orders (Dominicans and Franciscans) in the 13th century injected a potent intellectual stimulus, fostered by figures like Robert Grostete. The friars established their own claustral schools of theology, often providing superior facilities and drawing students away from the University’s public schools. However, the growing secular element—especially the new colleges—viewed the friars with profound jealousy, particularly their proselytizing zeal. Statutes were enacted explicitly to prevent mendicant friars from abducting boys under 18 into their Orders. Although the Pope intervened on the friars’ behalf, the foundational ethos of colleges like Merton (which excluded all “religious” persons) and Wyclif’s later powerful denunciations ultimately ensured the supremacy of the secular clergy and undermined the friars’ influence.

• Key Points:
  • Monastic orders (Benedictines, Franciscans) were vital early educators.
  • The secular University resisted the friars’ control and recruiting tactics.
  • The rise of colleges confirmed the victory of the secular clergy.

CHAPTER VI. THE UNIVERSITY IN THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY.

“The golden age of mediæval Oxford had culminated in the fourteenth century, and the fifteenth century ushered in a period of intellectual stagnation, which lasted for at least sixty years.”.

The 15th century was marked by intellectual decline and dwindling student numbers, largely due to national exhaustion from the French and Roses Wars, and anti-clerical sentiment. Halls were deserted, and evidence suggests learning was scarce. Despite this, Oxford maintained international representation at the Councils of Constance and Basle. Collegiate foundations continued, including Lincoln College (1427), founded specifically to extirpate Wycliffite heresy, and All Souls’ (1438), a grand foundation combining a chantry with a place of study. University infrastructure was enhanced with the completion of the Divinity School and Duke Humphry’s Library (1480), later the foundation of the Bodleian. The academic system achieved its final medieval organization, codifying a curriculum (Arts, higher faculties) based on the Trivium and Quadrivium. Requirements for degrees, particularly the M.A. (inception), demanded years of rigorous attendance at prescribed lectures and disputations, reflecting a long career path.

• Key Points:
  • University suffered intellectual stagnation and decreased enrollment.
  • Notable colleges (Lincoln, All Souls) and buildings (Divinity School) were founded.
  • The medieval curriculum was formally organized around the Arts faculty.

CHAPTER VII. THE RENAISSANCE, THE REFORMATION, AND THE TUDOR PERIOD.

“The first effect of the enthusiasm kindled by these new influences was to invigorate the University; it was not until their secondary effects were felt that a reaction manifested itself.”.

The late 15th-century revival was driven by the Renaissance and the importation of classical learning from Italy. Pioneers like Colet, Grocyn (who gave the first Greek lectures), and Linacre established the “new learning”. Bishop Fox’s founding of Corpus Christi College (1516) was revolutionary, establishing Greek and Latin professorships whose lectures were open to the entire University, despite facing opposition from the “Trojans”. Cardinal Wolsey’s lavish foundation of Cardinal College (later Christ Church) aimed to harness this new culture for the Church, but his fall in 1529 arrested its completion. Henry VIII forced Oxford to assent to his Divorce and the Royal Supremacy. The early Reformation initially harmed the University by creating instability and intellectual repression, although Henry VIII later endowed five Regius Professorships. Edward VI’s Visitation brought massive iconoclasm. Mary’s reign saw the swift Catholic Reaction, culminating in the martyrdoms of Ridley, Latimer, and Cranmer in Oxford (1555), a savage vengeance that ultimately hardened Protestant sentiment.

• Key Points:
  • Renaissance champions (Grocyn, Colet) introduced Greek and Latin studies.
  • Henry VIII endowed Regius Professorships; Wolsey founded Christ Church.
  • Mary’s Catholic Reaction culminated in Protestant martyrdoms.

CHAPTER VIII. REIGN OF ELIZABETH AND CHANCELLORSHIP OF LEICESTER.

“Thenceforth the University of Oxford, once open to all Christendom, was narrowed into an exclusively Church of England institution, and became the favourite arena of Anglican controversy…”.

Elizabeth’s accession brought a mild, but effective, Protestant Visitation, leading to the loss of Catholic scholars. The long chancellorship of Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester (from 1564), marked a pivotal era of modernization and Puritan influence. The University was formally incorporated by Act of Parliament in 1571, securing its privileges legally. Leicester also mandated that fellows subscribe to the Thirty-nine Articles upon matriculation (c. 1581), a move that formally restricted Oxford membership solely to adherents of the Church of England. Financial stability was enhanced by the Elizabethan Act requiring one-third of college rents to be paid in corn or malt, protecting revenues against inflation. Despite political turmoil and intellectual “depression” in the mid-reign, the late Elizabethan era saw a revival, crowned by Sir Thomas Bodley’s dedication to refounding the University Library (opened 1602), inspiring greater learning and research.

• Key Points:
  • University formally incorporated by 1571 Act of Parliament.
  • Leicester imposed subscription to the 39 Articles at matriculation.
  • The Bodleian Library was refounded, stimulating scholarship.

CHAPTER IX. THE UNIVERSITY UNDER JAMES I.

“The University patronised by James I.”.

James I. showed a “generous partiality” to Oxford, seeing it as a key pillar for the Crown and the Church. He granted the Universities the right to nominate to benefices held by Roman Catholic patrons. Politically, Oxford affirmed the doctrine of passive obedience in 1622. This period was dominated by the ascendancy of William Laud (Proctor 1603, President of St. John’s 1611), who deliberately shifted the University’s theological allegiance from Puritan Calvinism toward Arminian High Church doctrines, aligning with the King’s theories of Divine Right. Externally, the University flourished: the New Schools were completed, and Wadham and Pembroke Colleges were founded. The establishment of the Savilian Professorships of Geometry and Astronomy (1619) sought to prevent mathematical studies from sinking into “oblivion”.

• Key Points:
  • James I. provided significant political and financial support.
  • Laud’s influence drove the University toward Arminianism/High Church politics.
  • University enrollment increased, and the New Schools were completed.

CHAPTER X. THE UNIVERSITY UNDER CHARLES I. AND LAUD.

“However narrow may have been his Church policy, he was a true and loyal son of the University, by which he deserves to be remembered as an earnest reformer and liberal benefactor.”.

Charles I’s reign commenced with Parliament briefly meeting at Oxford (1625). Laud, elected Chancellor in 1630, devoted immense energy to disciplinary and moral reform. His most monumental achievement was the compilation of the Laudian (Caroline) Statutes, promulgated in 1636, which dictated governance for over two centuries. The Statutes formalized the Hebdomadal Board, vesting power oligarchically in the Heads of Houses and Proctors. They also instituted the proctorial “cycle” system to prevent “riotous” elections. The academic curriculum remained rigorous, emphasizing Aristotle, Greek, and Hebrew, although the formalized examinations quickly became ineffective. Laud endowed the Professorship of Arabic and secured Bibles printing rights. The University population reached about 4,000 scholars, but crowding persisted, and organized manly sports were discouraged, resulting in students frequently rebelling against tight discipline.

• Key Points:
  • Laud’s “Caroline Statutes” (1636) formalized oligarchical University governance.
  • Proctorial elections were reformed via the “cycle”.
  • University population reached a high of about 4,000.

CHAPTER XI. THE UNIVERSITY DURING THE CIVIL WARS AND THE SIEGE OF OXFORD.

“The part to be taken by the University of Oxford in the great national struggle now impending was never for a moment doubtful.”.

Oxford’s identification with the Crown and the Church ensured its absolute loyalty to Charles I. After failing to arrest the King’s requisition for funds (1642), the colleges unanimously loaned their plate to be melted down for coinage. Following the Battle of Edgehill (1642), Oxford became the royal head-quarters for nearly four years. The King resided at Christ Church, and Queen Henrietta Maria held court at Merton. Academic life ground to a halt; colleges were repurposed as barracks, arsenals, and mints. In 1644, Charles summoned his loyal Parliament to Oxford. After the defeat at Naseby, Fairfax besieged Oxford in 1646. Upon surrender, Fairfax guaranteed University privileges. The result was economic devastation: plate was gone, libraries were scattered, buildings were “out of repair,” and the number of scholars was severely diminished, leaving “scarce the face of an University left”.

• Key Points:
  • University gave total support (funds, plate, volunteers) to Charles I.
  • Oxford served as the Royalist capital (1642–1646).
  • The surrender left the institution impoverished and physically ruined.

CHAPTER XII. THE PARLIAMENTARY VISITATION AND THE COMMONWEALTH.

“The object of the Visitation was expressly defined to be ‘the due correction of offences, abuses, and disorders, especially of late times committed there.’”.

In 1647, Parliament, aiming to “reform” the Royalist stronghold, instituted a decade-long Visitation. The appointed Presbyterian Visitors aimed to enforce the Covenant and purge loyalty to the Crown. The University mounted a principled, passive resistance, but military force eventually prevailed, leading to the expulsion of between 400 and 500 members (Heads, Fellows, Scholars) who refused to submit. Oliver Cromwell became Chancellor in 1650 and proved supportive of learning, protecting endowments. Later Visitor Boards were dominated by Independents, who exercised despotic control over college management. Despite the turmoil, the Visitation eventually ceased due to political exhaustion. Critically, intellectual life revived strongly; even the Royalist historian Clarendon admitted that the University, by the Restoration, was “abounding in excellent learning”.

• Key Points:
  • Parliamentary Visitation (1647–1658) purged Royalist fellows and Heads.
  • Cromwell (Chancellor 1650) supported learning and resisted financial threats.
  • Academic life rebounded vigorously by 1660.

CHAPTER XIII. THE PERIOD BETWEEN THE RESTORATION AND THE REVOLUTION.

“By a clause in that Act [of Uniformity, 1662], it was for the first time required that every person elected to a college fellowship should make a declaration of conformity to the liturgy of the Church of England in the presence of the vice-chancellor.”.

The Restoration (1660) brought a reverse Visitation, reinstating exiled Royalists, but the Act of Uniformity (1662) solidified Oxford’s role as an Anglican seminary. Archbishop Sheldon funded the construction of the Sheldonian Theatre (completed 1669) to remove academic solemnities from the profaned St. Mary’s Church. Culture flourished with the founding of the Ashmolean Museum (1683) and a rising taste for music and belles-lettres. Politically, the University reaffirmed its belief in passive resistance (1683), leading to the arbitrary expulsion of John Locke from Christ Church by royal mandate (1684). This subservience was finally shattered by James II’s attempts to force Roman Catholic appointments, culminating in the Magdalen College crisis (1687). The Fellows’ successful resistance to the King’s arbitrary interference provided a key constitutional precedent leading up to the Revolution.

• Key Points:
  • Sheldonian Theatre constructed; Ashmolean Museum founded.
  • University doctrine of passive obedience led to John Locke’s expulsion.
  • Magdalen College successfully resisted James II’s mandate, triggering national crisis.

CHAPTER XIV. UNIVERSITY POLITICS BETWEEN THE REVOLUTION AND THE ACCESSION OF GEORGE III.

“However this may be, he [William III] certainly never courted or acquired popularity at the University, which henceforth became a hotbed of Jacobite disaffection for at least two generations.”.

Though the Revolution of 1688 was accepted, Oxford became a hotbed of Jacobite disaffection, rooted in Tory High Church principles hostile to the new Whig government. Open displays of disloyalty after the accession of George I. (1714) led the government to send a troop of dragoons to occupy and overawe the University (1715). The Whig “Constitution Club” faced constant Tory harassment. Due to this persistent disloyalty, the government seriously contemplated suspending and reforming the University constitution via patronage, a plan thankfully abandoned. Jacobitism gradually subsided under George II., though toasts to the Pretender and Tory political dominance persisted until the accession of George III. (1760). With the end of the Stuart threat, loyalty to the reigning monarch became fashionable, and the University’s political zeal faded into general Toryism.

• Key Points:
  • Oxford was dominated by Jacobite political sentiment.
  • Jacobite demonstrations led to military occupation in 1715.
  • Jacobitism faded into moderate Toryism by 1760.

CHAPTER XV. UNIVERSITY STUDIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.

“Such evidence as we possess, however, justifies on the whole the received opinion that this period is the Dark Age of academical history.”.

The 18th century represents a period of profound intellectual decay. The Laudian system collapsed, public examinations became “scandalous abuse,” and lecture halls were empty. Contemporary voices, including Adam Smith and Edward Gibbon, condemned the University’s pervasive idleness and the sinecurism of professors, who were paid by fixed stipends rather than student fees. Matriculation numbers dropped, and Oxford lost its intellectual leadership to London and Cambridge. However, the decay was not universal: some colleges (like Merton and Christ Church) maintained internal rigor through tuition and fellowship examinations. Figures such as Addison and John Wesley, though studying rigorous schedules privately, attest that scholarship was not wholly extinct.

• Key Points:
  • Period widely seen as the “Dark Age” of Oxford history.
  • Gibbon and others testified to professorial sinecurism and general idleness.
  • Intellectual life largely survived only through private study and college-specific rigor.

CHAPTER XVI. THE UNIVERSITY DURING THE REIGNS OF GEORGE III. AND GEORGE IV.

“The new Examination Statute of 1800, and the subsequent introduction of the class system, were the only events of any academical importance in the earlier of these periods…”.

The legislative energy of the University remained stagnant through this era, focused on trivial administrative detail. However, external growth continued with the foundation of several new professorships (Modern History, Common Law, etc.) and major architectural additions, including the Clarendon Building (1713) and the Radcliffe Library (1749). Politically, Oxford was fervently conservative, opposing Catholic Emancipation and Parliamentary Reform. Notable ceremonial events included the 1814 visit of the Allied Sovereigns. Crucially, the long-standing hostility with the City finally ended when the University, in 1825 and 1859, consented to abolish the centuries-old ritual penance (St. Scholastica’s Day submission) and the humiliating Mayor’s Oath.

• Key Points:
  • Growth continued in buildings (Radcliffe) and professorial endowments.
  • University maintained conservative political stance, opposing reform.
  • The City-University feud amicably concluded (1859) by abolishing the Mayor’s Oath.

CHAPTER XVII. OXFORD STUDIES AND EXAMINATIONS IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY.

“The studies of the University were first raised from their abject state by a statute passed in 1800.”.

The revitalization of Oxford began with the pivotal Examination Statute of 1800, which introduced graded Honours lists arranged by merit, compelling both students and examiners to raise their standards. Subsequent changes established written papers, created the modern class system, and focused studies into the comprehensive Literæ Humaniores School. The 1850 Statute structured the system into three stages (Responsions, Moderations, Finals) and opened new Honour Schools, including Natural Science and Modern History. The Royal Commission of 1850 preceded the sweeping University Reform Act of 1854, which democratized governance (replacing the oligarchical Hebdomadal Board with an elected Council), broke the college monopoly, opened fellowships to merit, and abolished religious tests at matriculation. This liberalization was completed by the Abolition of University Tests in 1871. The Commission of 1877 enforced college contributions (c. £20,000) for University purposes, particularly to endow professorships, furthering the shift toward modern research and teaching.

• Key Points:
  • 1800 Statute established competitive examinations and Honors lists.
  • 1854 Act reformed governance and mandated open fellowships.
  • All religious tests were abolished by Parliament in 1871.

CHAPTER XVIII. THE NEO-CATHOLIC REVIVAL, KNOWN AS THE ‘OXFORD MOVEMENT.’

“The Oxford Movement was set on foot with the deliberate purpose of defending the Church and the Christianity of England against the anti-Catholic aggressions of the dominant Liberalism.”.

The Oxford Movement (Tractarianism) was a scholarly reaction against the rising political tide of Liberalism in the 1830s, viewed as a threat to the Church. Oriel College became the intellectual centre, led by figures like Pusey, Keble, and primarily, John Henry Newman. The Movement officially began after Keble’s 1833 sermon, followed by the anonymous publication of the Tracts for the Times. Newman sought a via media, aiming to revive primitive Church usage and doctrine. However, the publication of Tract XC. (1841), which controversially interpreted the Thirty-nine Articles as compatible with Catholic doctrine, caused a national crisis and led to the collapse of the Movement’s academic influence. Newman himself seceded to Rome in 1845. The controversy was marked by the condemnation of Dr. Hampden (1836) and the public degradation of W. G. Ward (1845). Despite the resulting schism, the Movement profoundly influenced religious life and fostered philosophical toleration in later decades.

• Key Points:
  • Movement was a scholarly reaction against Liberal threats to the Anglican Church.
  • John Henry Newman was its highly influential leader.
  • Tract XC. (1841) caused the movement’s academic collapse and Newman’s secession.

CHAPTER XIX. THE UNIVERSITY IN 1886.

“The last chapter of University history covers a period within living memory, and practically coextensive with the reign of Queen Victoria.”.

By Queen Victoria’s accession, the collegiate structure was fixed, and examinations were effective, but the University remained clerical, aristocratic, and resisted modern connections like the railway (opened 1844). The reforms enacted post-1854 profoundly transformed Oxford: governance was democratized, the college monopoly weakened, and Unattached Students were accepted. The curriculum expanded significantly beyond the traditional Classics and Mathematics to embrace science and other modern subjects. The abolition of clerical restrictions led to the multiplication of feminine influences, as tutors could marry, breaking the semi-monastic ideal. The inflow of cosmopolitan elements (Oriental students, international scholars) and the progress of free thought reduced theological bigotry. By 1886, University morals and refinement had visibly improved, transforming Oxford into a far more national institution with a widespread control over the national mind, moving beyond its historical role as solely a clerical training school.

• Key Points:
  • Pre-1854: Clerical, aristocratic, resisted modernity (e.g., railway connectivity).
  • Post-1854: Governance democratized; college monopoly broken.
  • By 1886: Cosmopolitan, morally refined, possessing broad national influence.

---

Notable Quotes from the Book

1. “It is now admitted that nothing is certainly known of its origin, and that its alleged foundation by Alfred the Great rests upon a tradition which cannot be traced back to a period beyond the fourteenth century.”
2. “The present volume is an attempt to present in a succinct form the history of an University which, however uncertain its origin, is among the oldest institutions in Europe.”
3. “Merton College is entitled to something more than precedence, for its founder was the real founder of the English college-system.”
4. “…the ‘chamber-dekyns’ were always credited with the chief share in the street brawls and other excesses which so often disgraced the University in the Middle Ages.”
5. “The fourteenth century deserves to be regarded as the most progressive and eventful in the history of the Middle Ages.”
6. “…the fire of intellectual ambition burned with a tenfold intensity, and it was tempered by no such humility as the infinite range of modern science imposes on the boldest of its disciples.”
7. “…the Chancellor of the University obtained the sole control over the ‘assize’ of bread, wine, ale, and beer…”
8. “The Corporation of the University was now exempted from the payment of tenths, or first fruits…”
9. “…it was thought necessary to reduce the qualification of standing for the M.A. degree in order to reinforce the University with Masters.”
10. “The abolition of University Tests was adopted as a government measure and accepted by the House of Lords.”

About the Author

The Honourable George C. Brodrick, D.C.L., served as the Warden of Merton College, a powerful position he held at the time of this book’s original publication in 1900. The work was included in the Epochs of Church History series edited by Mandell Creighton, Bishop of London. Brodrick’s intimate connection to Merton—which he correctly identifies as the pioneer of the English collegiate system—provided a crucial perspective for this comprehensive history. He drew directly upon resources like the Merton College Register (kept since 1482) and his own published works on the college and on recent academic reforms. His motivation was to present a concise, historically proportionate account of Oxford’s development, avoiding excessive antiquarian detail and emphasizing “broad and undisputed facts”.

How to Get the Most from the Books

Focus on the evolution of college statutes and the constant political conflicts to understand Oxford’s unique institutional resilience and deep connection to national history.

---

Conclusion

Brodrick’s History of the University of Oxford successfully encapsulates seven centuries of academic life, illustrating how a turbulent, medieval collective, often overshadowed by external powers (Papacy, Crown, City), forged a remarkably resilient structure. The narrative highlights the enduring significance of the collegiate model, initiated by Merton, and the crucial role of external events—from the Wycliffite dissent to the dramatic schisms of the Neo-Catholic Revival—in shaping Oxford’s theological and political character. Ultimately, the book reveals a history defined by cyclical periods of decay and explosive reform, culminating in the late 19th century when the University finally shed its aristocratic, clerical shell to embrace a national, cosmopolitan identity, achieving its greatest extent of influence and intellectual vigor.